[zeromq-dev] JeroMQ vs. JZMQ java binding
Erwin Karbasi
erwin at optinity.com
Wed May 29 19:15:03 CEST 2013
Pieter Hintjens <ph <at> imatix.com> writes:
>
> Erwin,
>
> JeroMQ and JZMQ implement the same API and protocol so aim to be
> interchangeable, except that JeroMQ has JNI dependencies, and is
> faster in most cases. They're both official community projects and
> this is the list where we discuss them. If you need commercial
> support, let me know and we can arrange that.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Erwin Karbasi <erwin <at> optinity.com>
wrote:
> > Hello Masters,
> >
> > We are using ZMQ (java binding) to 0MQ.
> > We are planning to migrate to JeroMQ due to WebSphere application server is
> > not working smoothly with native lib regarding classloading separately in
> > two apps that reside on the same JVM.
> >
> > Following our questions:
> >
> > 1. Is there JeroMQ as OSGI enabled that is as a bundle.
> > 2. Who is support JeroMQ is there any discussion forum?
> > 3. What are the main differences between JZMQ and JeroMQ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erwin Karbasi
> > AT&T, Senior Software Architect
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev <at> lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
>
Hi Pieter,
Thanks for the response.
I think you mean here, "except that JeroMQ has JNI dependencies, and is
faster in most cases" JZMQ and not JeroMQ.
As we figured out from the benchmark that provided in the JeroMQ wiki in
most cases JeroMQ throughput equals to JZMQ.
Is there plan for OSGI enabled bundle for JZMQ or JeroMQ?
Cheers,
Erwin
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list