[zeromq-dev] clrzmq status

[Niels Berglund]

Hi Doron,

Oh, I see - sorry for assuming things. Sounds really cool, I'll start to
play with it. Would you say that the IOCP branch is stable enough to have a
go at?

Niels


On 3 March 2013 11:04, Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:

> netmq is a complete native port of libzmq. native code has some advantage
> over using pinvoke (memory management, debugging, better support for
> different environments). Also implementing some specific improvements
> should be easier in .net environment, like IO Completion ports (which I
> already implemented but didn't merge into the main branch
> https://github.com/somdoron/netmq/tree/IOCP), SSL/TLS and I also have in
> mind WebSockets as new transport.
>
> Doron
>
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Niels Berglund <
> niels.it.berglund at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > NetMQ is like JeroMQ, a single-language (C#, Java) reimplementation of
>> > libzmq that aims to be compatible with the higher level APIs. It
>> > should make it much easier for developers to get started.
>>
>> Thanks Pieter, but isn't the same true for clrzmq, (at the end of the day
>> we're doing P/Invoke calls into libzmq)? I.e. why would I choose one over
>> the other (other than personal preferences I mean).
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130303/d3015869/attachment.htm>