[zeromq-dev] clrzmq status

[Niels Berglund]

Hi Doron,

Thanks for your reply. Can you please educate me about netmq; i.e. what is
the purpose of netmq - I mean we do have clrzmq, what are the differences,
why would I choose one over the other (this is not meant to be a
controversial post, I am just curious)?

Thanks!
Niels


On 2 March 2013 12:46, Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:

> Regarding netmq, it's going well and pretty stable, performance is also
> good. I'm planning to make it ready with the next release of zeromq and
> trying to catch up with the commits on the main branch of the original
> project. The API is going to change soon as i'm trying to make it similar
> to clrzmq. Any help will be welcome, especially with unit testing and
> convert testing from original project to increase the coverage.
> On Mar 2, 2013 7:52 AM, "Frank Hale" <frankhale at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My original message wasn't nearly written as elegantly as yours Neils.
>> I'm extremely interested in clrzmq and want it to succeed. If help is
>> needed just ask!
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Niels Berglund <
>> niels.it.berglund at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As Frank, I am also interested in the state of the clrzmq project, and I
>>> did have an email-conversation with the maintainer of clrzmq a couple of
>>> days ago.
>>>
>>> He told me that the project was absolutely not abandoned, but that for
>>> various reasons he hadn't had time lately. He gathers he would get back
>>> into it within a couple of weeks, but that initially the activity would be
>>> low; mostly pull requests etc.
>>>
>>> As a side note; what is happening with the netmq? As with clrzmq it
>>> seems it is dormant, anyone knows?
>>>
>>> Niels
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 February 2013 23:17, Frank Hale <frankhale at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the current status of the clrzmq binding? The Github project
>>>> hasn't been updated in 3 months and the nuget stable package is still for
>>>> 2.2.5. I'm aware of the 3.0 RC1 but it was last updated November 6th.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130302/4cc656df/attachment.htm>