[zeromq-dev] pyzmq poll pull request results

[Min RK]

I wouldn't actually recommend using the green poller, it seems to miss the point. I would use a plain greenlet for each socket if possible.

-MinRK

On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:04, Brian Knox <brian.knox at neomailbox.net> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> (sorry about the new thread - was working on moving my email to a
> different provider in the middle of this)
> 
> Min - I merged the poll request on my little laptop and gave it a spin.
> Before your pull request:
> 
> 
> mps: 28066
> mps: 28116
> mps: 29745
> mps: 28912
> mps: 28679
> 
> after your pull request:
> 
> mps: 78138
> mps: 78364
> mps: 78411
> mps: 78065
> mps: 78175
> 
> Excellent.
> 
> By the way, just for fun I imported zmq.green instead of zmq without
> changing anything else
> 
> mps: 24738
> mps: 24779
> mps: 24759
> mps: 24630
> mps: 24702
> 
> And it's performance is well below straight zmq Poller.
> 
> 
> Thanks for the quick patch!
> 
> Brian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRybGWAAoJEAIP2j2QzUp7TqYH/3RFEE697uGGgWNSQhC1z+ik
> oOC3FQnnt1c/y5QUYZOIRyFl4LBZF0PL4u0Awy8Yxaqk7jJeM5wRkpa9cXsMC2xq
> yr9JhA3RGOhKsyExd9RGuaZzNKB4G5N+NTGYpDTHNSXTkFysBUWoxNsJYOs7HeC+
> GMblX+6FDzGbg8jYIULTIg8BPbLRen2n3wtROclpzVKrjoN0k91Duvon4VrJb1fp
> nZPGYqrEFlm/a3aTks/Mhh3wSq8yqt7AHD1qC7JqC4Yb262GjI0XCl1BAvzBcKCx
> Dj/9VpKYnesWbmrx/RPnxkkSdOgqJ7zIbhAGOFAEWyRI55WZGMkKUVQqWRfebRQ=
> =IOv1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev