[zeromq-dev] About zeroMQ 3.2.3 & 2.2.2

[Charles Remes]

You are confusing the library with the available bindings. There are libzmq bindings available in C, C++, Ruby, Python, Scheme, Perl and probably 20 more languages. Use the one that is the best fit for you and your problem space. There is no performance difference between the C and C++ bindings.

The library is written in C++. That has not changed from 2.x to 3.x. Martin Sustrik is working on a new library called nanomsg that he is writing in C. That is a different library.

cr

On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Shaukat Mahmood Ahmad <write at sma.im> wrote:

> zeroMQ version 3.2.3 is shipped with zmq.h (pure c implementation),
> however the older version (2.2.2) does contain zmq.hpp (C++ Version).
> So I am curious to know about recommendation is zeroMQ 3.2.3 is
> recomended with C only. I was reading
> artcilehttp://www.250bpm.com/blog:4 (Why should I have written ZeroMQ
> in C, not C++ Martin Sústrik, May 10th, 2012) I guess at that time the
> zeroMQ version was 2.2.2 and the next version was written in pure C?
> Most of examples under current documentation are also written in pure
> C, however at github zmq.hpp is also available so what is best option
> to write applications using zeroMQ C or C++?  is it just matter of
> choice and expertise or will there be some performance hit with C++?
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev