[zeromq-dev] Relevant RFCs for alternative implementations?

[Merijn Verstraaten]

L.S.,

Suppose I want to take a stab at an alternate implementation of ZMQ (mostly for reasons of practice, experimentation language specific features I'd want of the implementation), which RFCs would be relevant to be interoperable with the existing ZMQ implementation? The 23/ZMTP RFC refers to RFCS 23 through 31, are there any other relevant ones?

Cheers,
Merijn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130710/a2f9cc7a/attachment.sig>