[zeromq-dev] Efficiency for very few short messages

[dan smith]

more precisely: 'I do not know how to debug that further'


On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:49 AM, dan smith <dan25311 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Claudio,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> When it comes to 8, the timing changes randomly, sometime times is less
> than the time needed to solve 80 equations. I did 4 runs again, the times
> were between 115000 and 125000. This program is very simple and each and
> every thread does the very same thing using the very same code, no
> difference between the threads. I do know how to debug that further. The
>  main thread just sends the pointer and the worker thread solves it after
> receiving it, 3 lines are relevant.The thread is a basic windows thread
> like in inproc_lat.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Claudio Carbone <erupter at libero.it>wrote:
>
>> dan smith <dan25311 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >80 times: 64614micros and 134429micros, the serial is already faster.
>> >
>> >Going down to 8: 6345 and 328286...
>> >
>>
>> There must be something wrong if it takes less to solve 80eqs than 8, no
>> matter what.
>> Why don't you save/print split times for each eq and each phase of the
>> program?
>> With 8 it isn't crazy to analyze the numbers.
>>
>>
>> Claudio
>> -- Sent from my ParanoidAndroid Galaxy Nexus with K-9 Mail.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130121/cfd292a1/attachment.htm>