[zeromq-dev] [JZMQ] JZMQ and IPV6 support
Sabri Skhiri
sabri.skhiri at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 14:06:26 CET 2013
Hi Min, Steven
Is there any plan for such a patch? Should I propose one? Or asking first
for a feature request?
Thank you!
Sabri.
Le 10 janv. 2013 15:22, "Min" <miniway at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> For JZMQ, the option is not supported yet.
> We need a patch for the option.
>
> Thanks
> Min
>
> 2013년 1월 10일 목요일에 Steven McCoy님이 작성:
>
>> On 10 January 2013 04:25, Sabri Skhiri <sabri.skhiri at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We need to support an IPV6 environment and we currently use JZMQ. By
>>> googling IPV6 Support and ZMQ I found the Steven McCoy's patch reference (
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2011-August/012834.html).
>>>
>>> Basically it says that we just need to setup a socket option to false (*
>>> ZMQ_IPV4ONLY)*.
>>>
>>
>> Correct, the only thing missing which is something I recently discovered
>> is called "Happy Eyeballs" - RFC6555.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6555.txt
>>
>> I found this on a libcurl blog and as they haven't implemented it either:
>> it's a set of requirements for dual-stack environments to manage situations
>> when IPv6 connectivity fails and IPv4 is possible but with minimal delay
>> presented to the user. I'm not aware of an actual algorithm that does
>> implement the requirements though.
>>
>> By that description it may not to be too useful for ZeroMQ either.
>>
>> --
>> Steve-o
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130111/a28353e0/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list