[zeromq-dev] Comments on ZRE
ph at imatix.com
Mon Feb 18 14:00:25 CET 2013
I've made a pull request for a new RFC 21, then. It's unfinished; I'm
not sure what connection model you want to use for pub-sub and pgm.
Also, if you (or anyone else here) want to join the RFC project as
maintainer, that would be neat. https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/issues
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Michel Pelletier
<pelletier.michel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Pieter, I've forked spec 20 and will push some revisions with my
> I have implemented the extended beacon protocol in my project, and it works
> well! Thanks for being flexible about the changes.
> As for the details, I have made a few decisions solely for implementation
> purposes that are of course up for discussion, but here are the highlights:
> - I picked version 2
> - For service socket type, I am using the constants as defined in the zmq
> - For service transport, I picked 1: ipc, 2: tcp, 3: pgm. I'm not sure if
> ipc is very useful, but it's there for completeness.
> - If the service IP is 0.0.0.0, that's a flag to indicate using the IP from
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>> I've created a github repo and pull request for the import.
>> We need some maintainers, so anyone interested in clicking that Merge
>> button on RFCs, please: https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/issues/2
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
More information about the zeromq-dev