[zeromq-dev] a more modern, Java-idiomatic jzmq/jeromq API
trevor.bernard at gmail.com
Wed Feb 6 19:53:31 CET 2013
I've been using distinct API names as well. I'll be releasing a rough version of what John and I discussed on my GitHub probably later this evening called, jzmq-api, with a basic wrapper around the existing jzmq. Keep on mind that's its very much a work in progress and it's to facilitate discussion amongst the community. It will be released under LGPL.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-02-06, at 2:43 PM, John Watson <jkwatson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Personally I'd reuse JZMQ and make the low-level API a part of the new
>> > project. Over time you probably want to implement the HL classes directly
>> > over libzmq, and you can eventually deprecate the low-level API totally.
>> Just for the sake of compatibility, I would keep clear of reusing names; jzmq has had a lot of use so far, I believe it is better to come up with a new name (package) for the new project. That way we will avoid confusion.
> Absolutely agreed. I've been doing that in the jeromq project so far. I don't want to mess with the existing APIs and would never collide from a naming perspective (I'm using the jzmq APIs internally in a lot of places, so I *have* to use different packaging).
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the zeromq-dev