[zeromq-dev] a more modern, Java-idiomatic jzmq/jeromq API

[John Watson]

>
> > Personally I'd reuse JZMQ and make the low-level API a part of the new
> > project. Over time you probably want to implement the HL classes directly
> > over libzmq, and you can eventually deprecate the low-level API totally.
>
> Just for the sake of compatibility, I would keep clear of reusing names;
> jzmq has had a lot of use so far, I believe it is better to come up with a
> new name (package) for the new project. That way we will avoid confusion.


Absolutely agreed.  I've been doing that in the jeromq project so far. I
don't want to mess with the existing APIs and would never collide from a
naming perspective (I'm using the jzmq APIs internally in a lot of places,
so I *have* to use different packaging).

John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130206/ec750616/attachment.htm>