[zeromq-dev] Comments on ZRE
lists at chuckremes.com
Tue Feb 5 20:47:05 CET 2013
On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Michel Pelletier
> <pelletier.michel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would propose then an extension to the ZRE beacon format. The original 22
>> byte beacon would still be valid, but another format of a different version
>> would continue with: an octet describing the transport, and octet describing
>> the service socket type, and 4 octets that contain the connect-back address,
>> or something like that.
> That works for me. You can start a new spec for the beacon protocol,
> or I'll do it.
> I'm wondering whether it's time to move our RFCs into github and work
> on them using C4 and pull requests. Any thoughts on that? I can
> probably get that working without changing the appearance (it'll still
> look like a wiki, but would pull in content from a git repo).
Yes! I think applying C4 to RFCs is a great idea.
More information about the zeromq-dev