[zeromq-dev] Why 0mq doesn't define TTL for message (for in-mem queue)?

artemv zmq artemv.zmq at gmail.com
Fri Dec 27 13:30:54 CET 2013


Though, not sure where TTL should be defined: per message or/and per in-mem
queue .


2013/12/27 artemv zmq <artemv.zmq at gmail.com>

> hello there!
>
> Just came to my mind -- why 0mq doesn't define TTL?  0mq still queues
> messages inside in-mem queues, so eventually it's sort of queueing system
> (pls. don't blame me, I'm just saying) . Right?
> And all queueing solutions do have TTL .
>
> Overall, I'm big fan of 0mq, but some principal design choises make me
> really curious.
>
>
> BR
> -artemv
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131227/7db202c0/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list