[zeromq-dev] When unreliability is desired

[Lindley French]

Any particular reason? The natural extension of that philosophy is that I
shouldn't bother looking at ZeroMQ because it's an existing library and I
might be able to solve my problems other ways.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Lindley French <lindleyf at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It would be really neat if we could integrate something like
> > http://feclib.sourceforge.net/documentation.html into this. Not sure how
> > that possibility would work license-wise, though.
>
> I'd recommend against looking at existing libraries unless they are
> compelling answers to a problem we've not been able to solve any other
> way.
>
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131218/4f9529dd/attachment.htm>