[zeromq-dev] Does ZMQ handle tcp-RST?
Pieter Hintjens
ph at imatix.com
Tue Dec 17 10:49:23 CET 2013
<chirrup> <chirrup>
I think I told you that HWM=0 does not eliminate send buffers.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:57 AM, artemv zmq <artemv.zmq at gmail.com> wrote:
> hello there, devs
>
> do we have any updates here?
>
>
> 2013/12/14 artemv zmq <artemv.zmq at gmail.com>
>>
>> Ok. I set HWM to 0. Launched DEALER (my client) , and ROUTER (my
>> server). Client sends "hello" , server replies with "world". Laucnhed them
>> in separate processes, looked
>> at logs, seen some chatting, hello-world-hello-world , and so on. And
>> then I decided to kill server process (on windows in cmdline: taskkill /f
>> /pid <<PID>>).
>>
>> I expected that I would see the warnings produced by my application (since
>> appl. logic is checking the result of .send(byte[]) function). But .send()
>> is always good.
>> So, with HWM=0 on socket and gotten RST, .send() function still
>> tells me that send was successfull. Isn't this is a bug ?
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/13 Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Justin Karneges <justin at affinix.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > If you want to prevent queuing in all cases, set HWM to 0.
>>>
>>> This will not actually prevent all queuing, just remove buffering in
>>> ZeroMQ. You'll still get buffering in TCP and on the network itself.
>>>
>>> If you want to remove all queuing completely, you have to switch to a
>>> synchronous REQ/REP model, which is nasty. Better, use a credit based
>>> flow control system to manage precisely the total amount of buffering.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list