[zeromq-dev] C# binding to zeromq (clrzmq project)

[Bruno D. Rodrigues]

all implementation shall talk to all implementations without issues, or else report a bug and provide a fix ;)


On Dec 12, 2013, at 13:01, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhvalnov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Doron.
> 
> How about NetMQ to JeroMQ?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Doron Somech <somdoron at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitriy,
> 
> NetMQ can talk to ZeroMQ, just make sure you are using the latest version available on nuget (and leave the the Endian setting as Big).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Doron
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhvalnov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, that is what is worrying me as well (no commits).
> 
> Thanks, Matt !
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Matt Connolly <matt.connolly at me.com> wrote:
> I haven’t had any problems. I recently switched from clrzmq to NetMQ and I’m talking to ruby processes using the rbczmq gem (which I chose because it was faster and more ruby-like in its implementation than the ruby-ffi zmq gem).
> 
> I can’t speak for the maintainers of clrzmq. There have been no commits in over a year in here: https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq  
> 
> -Matt
> 
> On 11 Dec 2013, at 10:12 pm, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhvalnov at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Is it compatible with zeromq? I mean i can interop from C# side using netmq to ruby-ffi with native zeromq and vice versa?
>> 
>> Officially it means native zeromq binding to CLR is dead?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Matt Connolly <matt.connolly at me.com> wrote:
>> NetMQ is a native C# implementation that appears more active than clrzmq:
>> 
>> https://github.com/zeromq/netmq
>> 
>> -Matt
>> 
>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 9:39 pm, Dmitriy Vsekhvalnov <dvsekhvalnov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> trying to get an idea if clrzmq (https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq) is supported or not anymore. It doesn't seem to support latest v4.x release.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> If not supported any alternates? 
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131212/93cb8312/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 235 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131212/93cb8312/attachment.sig>