[zeromq-dev] rfc22
crocket
crockabiscuit at gmail.com
Mon Dec 9 13:26:49 CET 2013
I'm here to raise a nit-picking point.
I tend to know how communities, softwares, and processes are assets.
But I was confused about "mining for issues"(probably for profit) because
issues themselves are not assets.
My language is not good enough to figure out what we'd mine issues for.
What do you think we mine issues for?
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> This is awesome :-) While other people mine for BitCoin, we can mine for
> issues.
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Chris Laws <clawsicus at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply Pieter, that's the information I was after.
> >
> > I have created a new team to maintain the buildbot project and have added
> > you to it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131209/87ab53e6/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list