[zeromq-dev] Hi All

[Bhanu Chouhan]

thank you so much Michel.

regards,
Bhanu


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Michel Pelletier <
pelletier.michel at gmail.com> wrote:

> The two cases you are comparing are not equivalent.   The socket example
> simple streams data from one process to another, but REQ/REP are
> synchronous, you are issuing a "fetch" request and waiting for the reply.
>  That round trip takes time that your socket example does not replicate.
>
> Read the guide, use PUSH and PULL sockets, and loose the whole "fetch"
> thing and you'll get the same performance as with sockets.
>
> -Michel
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Bhanu Chouhan <
> bhanupratapsinghchouhan88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have tried some request and reply example.
>>
>> I have written a simple server and client in BSD sockets. In which server
>> (file_bsd_ser.py) binary read a file requested from client
>> (file_bsd_req.py) and send it to client in chunks.
>>
>> I have done the same using ZMQ REQ & REP sockets in filerepexp.py
>> (server) and filereqexp.py (client).
>>
>> The file i have chosen was of 50 MB.
>>
>> The task is taking almost double time in case of ZMQ, but it should not
>> be the case.
>>
>> Please please please help me on above query that why ZMQ taking more
>> time. Actually it is required for my project on ZMQ study.
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> Bhanu
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20131203/6edd0d67/attachment.htm>