[zeromq-dev] nitro
Pieter Hintjens
ph at imatix.com
Fri Aug 23 23:18:17 CEST 2013
A lot of this is 2.x stuff and no longer relevant. Still, it's very
nice to see people explore this space.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk> wrote:
> On 23 August 2013 14:37, Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk> wrote:
>>
>> On very small (<40 byte) TCP messages and inproc messages, ZeroMQ is
>> faster (30-40%) than Nitro; Nitro's use of mutex/cond on socket queues
>> probably costs it there.
>
> I'm seeing atypical pthread mutex usage in the code-base, it is trivial to
> optimise with an adaptive mutex and further improvements are usually
> available with members of the spin lock family.
>
> --
> Steve-o
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list