[zeromq-dev] nitro

[Steven McCoy]

On 23 August 2013 14:37, Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk> wrote:

>
>    - On very small (<40 byte) TCP messages and inproc messages, ZeroMQ is
>    faster (30-40%) than Nitro; Nitro's use of mutex/cond on socket queues
>    probably costs it there.
>
> I'm seeing atypical pthread mutex usage in the code-base, it is trivial to
optimise with an adaptive mutex and further improvements are usually
available with members of the spin lock family.

-- 
Steve-o
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130823/7ec37fe8/attachment.htm>