[zeromq-dev] Simple questions

[KIU Shueng Chuan]

In zmq.cpp function zmq_send(), it doesn't _close but has a comment that
this is dependent on knowledge of the implementation, which may change.

Should bindings be assuming this implementation detail?
On Apr 27, 2013 12:18 AM, "Pieter Hintjens" <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> For what it's worth, there were two cases in CZMQ that did _close
> after _send; I've removed these and re-run the tests under Valgrind
> and it does not leak memory, as expected.
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Alexey Melnichuk <mimir at newmail.ru>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I write Lua binding to ZeroMQ3.
> >> And i have 2 question:
> >> 1. Do i need close message after send/move.
> >
> > No, you don't. It's not well documented though but _send takes
> > ownership, and _close isn't needed.
> >
> >> Manual says:
> >> `The zmq_msg_t structure passed to zmq_msg_send() is nullified during
> the call`.
> >> But do that mean I have to call zmq_msg_close?
> >> 2. zmq_ctx_destroy in libzmq (3.3.0) marked as `Old (legacy) API`
> >> Manual has nothing about zmq_ctx_term.
> >
> > We had used zmq_ctx_destroy for a while, then switched to zmq_ctx_term
> > because people felt the context wasn't destroyed, just terminated.
> > However the man pages still speak of "destroying the context", so we
> > need to fix that.
> >
> > My fault about the man pages not mentioning zmq_ctx_term; I had
> > uploaded them from an old version. Fixing that right now.
> >
> > -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20130427/699e83bc/attachment.htm>