[zeromq-dev] IPC performance in ZMQ version 2.2 vs. 3.

Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Sat Oct 20 18:54:59 CEST 2012


On 19 October 2012 21:34, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> It should be possible IMO to do memory-mapped IPC that would cut out
> the kernel; no-one's spent time investigating this though.
>
>
Shared memory is conducive to a pro-actor model, a reactor model could be
implemented in a hybrid fashion with an eventfd or socketpair for edge
detection so performance gain is likely to only appear with large payloads
or constant throughput.

I'd be interested to hear alternatives.

-- 
Steve-o
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20121020/cde707ee/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list