[zeromq-dev] Is there already native "high level" connection pool?

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Tue Nov 27 15:05:54 CET 2012

Time to discuss this on #zeromq irc now?

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Stefan de Konink <stefan at konink.de> wrote:
> On 11/27/12 14:57, Ian Barber wrote:
>> So, for an example you might want to look at how Mongrel2 handles this
>> kind of thing. Messages flow across ZeroMQ with a connection ID and a
>> body, and get written to the appropriate HTTP connection. So, basically,
>> don't use SND_MORE to handle the stream, send each part individually,
>> and include a connection identifier as a message part within each one.
>> As Michel says, multipart messages are delivered atomically so they wont
>> give you the behaviour you are looking for, pooling or not.
> So the messages for the solution with the lowest latency look something
> like:
> [Envelope + MessageId, DataPart]
> Where the triplet is send atomically and the workers below it
> reconstruct the messages as Michel suggested? (Given that the messages
> arrive in incremental order.)
> Stefan
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list