[zeromq-dev] number of sockets for inproc

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Tue Nov 20 03:04:05 CET 2012

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Ilja Golshtein <ilejncs at narod.ru> wrote:

> Is the change between 2.0 and 2.1 expected?
> Is the behavior considered normal or it is a bug and it could be fixed?
> How does 3.x behave?

Yes, this was a change in 2.1, designed to get around limitations and
crashes caused by the original mailbox design.

3.x behaves the same way. There might be a way to optimise for pure inproc use.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list