[zeromq-dev] Compatibility 3.1 - 3.2.1-rc2

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Thu Nov 15 19:14:58 CET 2012

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Emmanuel TAUREL <taurel at esrf.fr> wrote:

> My vote is in favor of compatibility.
> If making 3.2 talk to 3.1 is "pretty simple", it could be added to 3.2
> even if it delays 3.2 by few days.
> But will it also solve the other way round: 3.1  talk to 3.2?

It's doable but who are you expecting to cover the cost of doing this,
and on what basis?


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list