[zeromq-dev] Compatibility 3.1 - 3.2.1-rc2

[Charles Remes]

I sense another French blog rant is coming soon. :)

(just kidding!!!)

cr

On Nov 15, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Aurélien Vallée <vallee.aurelien at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have exactly the same problem...
> Tons of 3.1 pub/sub everywhere, and need to udpate to 3.2 => the whole architecture has to be update at the same time. Enjoy.
> 
> Can't even build something more robust top of 0mq, since most of the time the only internal error handling of 0mq is a rough assert.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Emmanuel TAUREL <taurel at esrf.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 15/11/2012 13:26, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> >
> > So the 3.1 release is problematic, it uses the old wire protocol but
> > does subscription upstreaming. The strategy we're using now can't
> > recognize this mix. If anyone wants to take a look at the protocol and
> > see if there's a solution...
> >
> > I think we may have to consider 3.1 as an incompatible version. It
> > should not have been released as stable with this incompatibility.
> >
> >
> Gasp !!
> We have hundred  of processes running zmq 3.1 (nicely).
> We have started with ZMQ 3.0 which has been made incompatible with ZMQ
> 3.1. We moved to 3.1 and  now 3.2.1 is  incompatible.
> 
> For application users, these incompatibilities generate quite some
> trouble and make our life more complicated.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Emmanuel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aurélien Vallée
> +33 6 47 41 70 37
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20121115/4ab70924/attachment.htm>