[zeromq-dev] Linux.fr Article - User feedback on ZMQ (for french readers only)

Michel Pelletier pelletier.michel at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 22:46:36 CET 2012


I agree with Brian on both his points.  This a lot of raffut about nothing.
 If these people don't want to use 0mq, we'll be happy to eat their lunch.

-Michel


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Brian Knox <briank at talksum.com> wrote:

> Hello Lourens!
>
> I fail to see the "failure" here.  A new feature that people wanted
> was added to a release candidate.  Problems were found, in the release
> candidate.  The feature, based on community feedback, was reworked and
> fixed.
>
> To me, this looks like a success!
>
> Brian
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Lourens Naudé
> <lourens at methodmissing.com> wrote:
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > It references a feature I contributed that yes, admittedly, should have
> been
> > discussed better. This particular feature suffered from some stability
> > issues for a while, mostly as a result of a bad variable args API
> decision
> > and touching code paths that's not easy to cover in tests ( runs within
> the
> > context of an I/O thread and deals with the network ). It's been reworked
> > after RC1 from community feedback.
> >
> > Apologies for shipping something implicated in this bad publicity,
> however,
> > it's still a pretty narrow rant.
> >
> > - Lourens
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Brian Knox <briank at talksum.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 0mq will live or die on it's merits.
> >>
> >> I think the best response to such discussions is to produce great
> >> things built with 0mq.
> >>
> >> Github commits are, in my opinion,  better arguments than blog comments.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:02 PM, jeff murphy <jcmurphy at jeffmurphy.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > http://linuxfr.org/nodes/96358/comments/1407288
> >> >
> >> > On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 AM, LECLERCQ Nicolas
> >> > <nicolas.leclercq at synchrotron-soleil.fr> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >> Could someone react to the following (french) post please?
> >> >> http://linuxfr.org/users/krunch/journaux/zeromq-et-les-mangoustes
> >> >> The idea is clearly not to involve you in controversy. The aim is
> just
> >> >> to
> >> >> have the zmq community's point of view on an article which content
> >> >> conflicts with what is explained in:
> >> >> http://www.zeromq.org/topics:planning. Your contribution would help
> >> >> guys
> >> >> trying to make a choice for their future projects.
> >> >> Thanks for your help.
> >> >> N.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20121113/ac5df5d3/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list