[zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ + InetD = Why can't we all just get along.

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Sat Nov 10 08:57:08 CET 2012

Right. What I'm finding is that 0MQ doesn't treat the inetd server as
a valid peer, for some reason, and reconnects over and over... my
client doesn't have time to complete a ZMTP handshake before it's
interrupted. Your solution avoids using 0MQ at all over inetd.

I'll try a few more things. How critical is this?


On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Shane Spencer <shane at bogomip.com> wrote:
> OK..  No laughies.  Here's my sample approach for spinning up workers
> from a tornado instance using InetD
> https://gist.github.com/4048989
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list