[zeromq-dev] 3.1 stability status

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Mon May 28 03:01:22 CEST 2012

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:41 AM, MinRK <benjaminrk at gmail.com> wrote:

> PyZMQ makes no effort to test libzmq itself, so I would say that passing
> pyzmq's tests only gets you "probably not totally broken."  It took me about
> one day of using 3.1.1 to discover a dealbreaker bug for daily use (reported
> as LIBZMQ-369).

Nice bug.

> I do think think a Python test suite for libzmq itself makes sense, but I
> don't add tests for libzmq bugs to the pyzmq suite.

Indeed. It would be good to make a Python test suite for libzmq apart
from the pyzmq test suite.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list