[zeromq-dev] Event-driven publish-subscribe model

Ian Barber ian.barber at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 18:58:58 CEST 2012

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chuck Remes <lists at chuckremes.com> wrote:

> Yes, this is true. I answered assuming that the OP wanted to work with
> just a single set of sockets rather than having a "side channel" for
> communicating the credit flows. Either way will work, so it's up to the OP
> to figure out which way makes more sense to him.
> cr

Ack. I've found that I tend to lean to separating message flows over
different topologies as I've done more stuff with ZMQ - it seems to fall
out of a lot of different requirements. Definitely does cause more config
management though to have to deal with extra sockets though, so a fair
point. If 3.1 was an option and you wanted a tasty one socket set hack, you
can communicate credit via subscribe messages back up stream :)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120326/96fa3a68/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list