[zeromq-dev] Duplicate identities - #325

Pieter Hintjens pieterh at gmail.com
Sat Mar 24 02:24:32 CET 2012


This is for routing only, we don't do durable sockets any longer in 3.1. So
it should be OK.
On Mar 23, 2012 6:09 PM, "Ian Barber" <ian.barber at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> My fix is to allow this (and not assert!) so that the second client's
>> identity request will be ignored. This means a well-behaving client
>> and server can't be disturbed by an incorrect or hostile client.
>>
>>
> Great, thanks, I was getting no where with this trying to work out why the
> race was occurring, so I like this solution. My one question would be
> around disconnect/reconnect - if we lose connection and reestablish are we
> going to trigger this situation? I am still mostly against use of manual
> identities though so I am only in a limited way concerned about this :)
>
> Ian
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120323/a02eb3b2/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list