[zeromq-dev] Proposal for next stable release

Mark Wotton mark at ninjablocks.com
Mon Mar 19 06:42:45 CET 2012


On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:12 PM, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net
> wrote:

>
> On 19/03/2012, at 11:15 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> >
> > It's not about restriction but simply about the ability to remix a
> > fork (e.g. it's only thanks to the LGPL that a fork like xs is not
> > really toxic but rather an interesting experiment).
>
> I do not understand this. Perhaps you can explain.
>
> You can mix in my FFAU code to your code base.
> I cannot mix your LGPL code into mine.
>

John,

That's true, but were you planning to mix 0MQ in, or just link it? A lot of
my code is either FFAU or fully copyrighted - AFAICT, I'm ok either way
unless I want to use a local fork of 0mq, aren't I?

(G'day, btw - been a long time since Newtown :)

cheers
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120319/2c1f9327/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list