[zeromq-dev] weird bug

Andrew Hume andrew at research.att.com
Mon Mar 5 02:15:39 CET 2012


thanks, pieter.
i started doing a diff on teh code and found this.

i, like lucas, am programming around this, but i think its worth a mention
in the man page because before this fix, we essentially never saw
EINTR, but afterwards, we do quite often. so the sample code is IMHO inadequate.

	andrew

On Mar 4, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Andrew Hume <andrew at research.att.com> wrote:
> 
>> really? it wasn't mentioned in the "what's changed logs",
>> and represents a semantic change.
>> i hope someone like martin or pieter can speak to this..
> 
> commit 3cb929e46affd5ebf8c456acba594bae5c106cc8
> Author: Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com>
> Date:   Thu Jul 21 23:35:26 2011 +0200
> 
>    mailbox::recv correctly passes EINTR to the caller
>    This bug caused signal during blocking call to assert.
>    Signed-off-by: Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com>
> 
> It looks like this change didn't have an issue, and got into 2.1.8
> without proper documents.
> 
> -Pieter
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev


------------------
Andrew Hume  (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845
andrew at research.att.com  (Work) +1 973-236-2014
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120304/b2c9ed9f/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list