[zeromq-dev] PUB/SUB Socket Deletion & Recreation Race Condition
Pieter Hintjens
ph at imatix.com
Thu Jun 7 12:24:42 CEST 2012
Tom,
Can you make a minimal test case, ideally in C, and log this as an issue?
-Pieter
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Tom Cocagne <tom.cocagne at gmail.com> wrote:
> While attempting to unit test some code based on PUB/SUB sockets
> (pyzmq 2.1.10 & zmq 2.1.11), I ran into an unfortunate race condition
> that occasionally breaks the unit tests. Usually the message exchanges
> work fine but occasionally the unit tests randomly break due to some
> or all of the nodes completely failing to send messages.
>
> The unit tests use 3 nodes that consist of a pair of PUB/SUB sockets
> where each SUB socket is connected to all PUB sockets (including the
> node's own PUB socket). The individual unit tests involve various
> message exchanges between the nodes. In typical unit test fashion
> (python unit testing anyway), the nodes are created immediately before
> each test begins and are torn down immediately after each test
> completes.
>
> It seems that, when using 'ipc:///' on Linux at least, closing the zmq
> sockets followed immediately by recreating and reconnecting them
> occasionally renders the sockets unusable. No messages are received
> from the PUB sockets and the connection never recovers. Inserting as
> little as a 50ms delay between each test completely prevents this
> problem from occurring though.
>
> Is this a bug or expected behavior? Due to the multi-threaded nature
> of the zmq backend I can see the response to this issue legitimately
> being "don't do that" but I'm not a fan of littering my code with
> magic "this ought-ta be long enough" delays.
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list