[zeromq-dev] what are the best practices to send complex objects?

[aalok sood]

If you are **really** concerned about performance, I suggest you have your
own protocol that both sides understand.
This way you send data as it is, the remote side would know how to
interpret it.



On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Cem Karan <cfkaran2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been playing with MessagePack (http://msgpack.org/) for
> serialization and BLOSC (http://blosc.pytables.org/trac) for compression.
>  They seem to work pretty well together.  How fast is fast?  BLOSC is
> designed to move data around in memory faster than memcpy() is able to do
> it, and I haven't had any complaints about how fast MessagePack works
> (OTOH, I'm I/O bound, so I tend not to hit any limits).
>
> Thanks,
> Cem Karan
>
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 3:37 AM, anti_tenzor wrote:
>
> > Hello, all,
> >
> > I'd like to use ZMQ to send complex objects between applications (using
> > CLRZMQ c# wrapper). Since it is possible to send byte[] arrays only,
> > I am forced to implement some serialization-deserialization mechanism.
> >
> > But the hole idea is to be as fast as possible! So it looks like this
> > algo should be:
> > 1. Extremely fast
> > 2. Produce very compact byte arrays
> >
> > Could you please suggest some best practices or libraries (.net), that
> > meets these requirements?
> >
> > How do you send complex ojects via ZMQ in real-life applications?
> >
> > Thank you in advance!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120717/ef6cb1f2/attachment.htm>