[zeromq-dev] mailbox.cpp Assertion

[Thomas S Hatch]

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Ian Barber <ian.barber at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No, I am confident that we are not passing sockets through threads or
>> processes.
>> Could this have anything to do with closing and re opening connections?
>>
>
> Do you pull the FD out directly, or is this just from accessing via the
> regular ZMQ_ functions? Also, do you have any idea how quickly a socket
> might be destroyed and recreated or similar?
>
> Ian
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
There is an option in Salt that makes the SUB socket close and reconnect to
the master every N seconds to recover from disconnection over unreliable
connections, aka the internet. The default is every 60 seconds

It just uses the regular ZMQ function via pyzmq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120709/72dea619/attachment.htm>