[zeromq-dev] Proposal for libzmq maintenance

[Martin Lucina]

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:16:44 -0600
Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> 
> > +1 from myself
> >
> > I also second Mato's concern about fragmenting the discussion about
> > individual patches. Care should be taken keep it in one place (ML,
> > presumably) where anyone interested can follow it easily.
> 
> Excellent, thanks. If we cross-post pull requests to the ML,
> discussion can happen either there on the ML or on the PR thread.
> People will converge on whatever works best.

Nice idea; i'm curious to see how you implement it :-)

The important (and probably hard) part is cross-posting the discussion
threads from the PRs to the ML in a way that makes sense.

-mato
-- 
Martin Lucina <martin at lucina.net>