[zeromq-dev] Getting 0MQ/3.1 to stable status

[Calvin de Vries]

I had LIBZMQ-307 happen to me in production recently. To note, I am using
3.0.2 (which I know is no longer supported), but I think it should be made
sure that this isn't occurring in 3.1. If I have time later today I can try
to do a test with 3.1, but am not sure yet if that will be possible.


On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Schmurfy <schmurfy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I added a new issue I found on the 3.1 master branch: LIBZMQ-325
> It allows to crash a server so I would consider it critical, two clients
> can connect with the same identity but bad things happen when one of them
> disconnects.
>
>
> On 20 February 2012 17:33, Emmanuel TAUREL <taurel at esrf.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>> On 20/02/2012 17:21, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Pieter Hintjens<ph at imatix.com>  wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Emmanuel TAUREL<taurel at esrf.fr>
>>  wrote:
>> >>> - LIBZMQ-268
>> >>> - LIBZMQ-283
>> > These same to be the same problem?
>> Not exactly.
>> In LIBZMQ-268, the whole multipart message is lost (using PGM). In
>> LIBZMQ-283, only the first part of the multipart message is lost using
>> TCP.
>>
>> Thank's for your help
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120221/215df203/attachment.htm>