[zeromq-dev] Getting 0MQ/3.1 to stable status

[Chuck Remes]

On Feb 16, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> So the two main issues we need to fix are #264 and #270. They are, by
> all accounts, extremely hard to solve, and anyone finding a clean
> solution would be regarded with awe and admiration.
> 
> -Pieter

Yes, plus both issues have C test cases to reproduce the problems. #264 has the test case attached directly while the test code for 270 is here:

https://github.com/zeromq/issues/tree/master/270

cr