[zeromq-dev] Getting 0MQ/3.1 to stable status

[Pieter Hintjens]

So the two main issues we need to fix are #264 and #270. They are, by
all accounts, extremely hard to solve, and anyone finding a clean
solution would be regarded with awe and admiration.

-Pieter



On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Brian Knox <taotetek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Great news, Pieter.  I just did a build of our rsyslog plugins against 3.1
> today to start testing.
>
> Brian
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's probably a good time to start moving 0MQ/3.1 towards stable status.
>>
>> Several things you can do to help:
>>
>> * If you have outstanding issues in 3.1 that you need fixed, please
>> remind us of them
>> * If you're maintaining a language binding, make sure you have 3.1
>> support in place
>> * If you're maintaining documentation that refers to 2.1, time to
>> start making a 3.1 upgrade
>>
>> We may be able to get all our projects ready for a 3.1 release
>> candidate within 2-3 weeks.
>>
>> -Pieter
>> _______________________________________________
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>