[zeromq-dev] Process for evolving the API

[Pieter Hintjens]

asserting failure is a great idea.
On Feb 8, 2012 12:16 AM, "Michel Pelletier" <pelletier.michel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com> wrote:
>
> >  * When further sufficient time has passed, the old features MAY be
> > removed fully, or may be left as legacy features.
> > * Old names MUST NOT be reused by new features, ever.
>
> Does you last point there mean someone has to keep track of the
> "forbidden" names over time?  Maybe instead of removing old features
> fully, ala your second to last point, they assert failure forever.
>
> -Michel
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120208/16196686/attachment.htm>