[zeromq-dev] Thread Safe sockets

[john skaller]

On 07/02/2012, at 1:05 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:

>> Of course it does, because that's NOT the model of threads,
>> the model you describe is processes.
> 
> Fair enough. However, I am not sure whether there's a practical difference between the two.

Threads imply shared memory, that's the whole point of them.

> Do we have an use case where the current model of non-thread-safe sockets + ability to migrate sockets between threads is not sufficient?


Do you have a use case where existing Posix sockets/fds is not sufficient?

--
john skaller
skaller at users.sourceforge.net