[zeromq-dev] C++ assertion failed with Java client
martin at lucina.net
Sat Feb 4 13:38:17 CET 2012
ph at imatix.com said:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote:
> > I'm kind of wondering about the private email conversations you, PH
> > and MS had. Would it be possible to publish some of those
> > conversations on this list?
> I'm not OK with that. Private emails are not for public display, and
> publishing them would be a breach of confidence, and copyright.
> But open discussion, sure. This is an important matter and affects us
> all, and my intention is to make sure everyone's voice is heard and
> consensus opinion is implemented.
I have reviewed the relevant email threads in question, and it is my
opinion that there is nothing of commercial importance in them. On the
contrary, they do concern the ZeroMQ community.
I would like to go on the record as stating:
The threads in question are the full conversations defined by the following
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:35:32 -0600
From: Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com>
To: Martin Lucina <martin at lucina.net>, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com>
Subject: 3.1 release
Message-ID: <CADL5_siD35NnFGeiKyyLqOAMsgnc4XNZZR3DUYddV7kK2375cA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:16:54 +0900
From: Martin Lucina <martin at lucina.net>
To: Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com>
Cc: sustrik at 250bpm.com
Subject: 3.1 releases, Distributions Wiki page
Message-Id: <20111220091654.05261dc03816046900f83ce2 at lucina.net>
If, and only if, both Pieter Hintjens and Martin Sustrik give their consent
to making these conversations public, in their entire and unredacted form,
then I also give my consent to making these conversations public, in their
entire and unredacted form.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the zeromq-dev