[zeromq-dev] conventions in bindings

[john skaller]

On 03/02/2012, at 8:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:

> 
> The main confusion is really just one point: POSIX tends to use
> "message" as a single unit of transfer. 0MQ has multi-part messages.

I had no problem with that, rather the confusion between message
(as in what is sent) and message (as in zmq_msg_t).

So you could say "after the zmq_recv_msg function returns
the message may contain a message" ...

Huh??

Or should I say "the message isn't a message until after the function
returns" .. 

Huh??

Of course different people will find different things difficult.

--
john skaller
skaller at users.sourceforge.net