[zeromq-dev] C++ assertion failed with Java client

Ian Barber ian.barber at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 12:43:39 CET 2012

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Martin Lucina <martin at lucina.net> wrote:

> > I repeat the word *minimal* for emphasis. If you are spending fifteen
> > emails arguing a design, it isn't minimal.
> Such as your design of defaulting to ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE ("") for SUB sockets?
To be fair, that just changed in the binding conventions thread :)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120203/d7d1e3ea/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list