[zeromq-dev] C++ assertion failed with Java client

[Ian Barber]

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Martin Lucina <martin at lucina.net> wrote:

>
> > I repeat the word *minimal* for emphasis. If you are spending fifteen
> > emails arguing a design, it isn't minimal.
>
> Such as your design of defaulting to ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE ("") for SUB sockets?
>
>
To be fair, that just changed in the binding conventions thread :)

Ian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120203/d7d1e3ea/attachment.htm>