[zeromq-dev] C++ assertion failed with Java client

[Martin Lucina]

ph at imatix.com said:
> So, in summary, let's cut the philosophy and focus on targeted
> *minimal* patches to solve identified problems.

+1, although "minimal" is a matter of opinion.

Pieter, with all due respect, it's a shame that this community is turning
into one driven by personal ideology rather than a meritocracy based on
quality *technical* contributions. That was not what I signed up for when I
started contributing to this project.

Maybe you could also tone down the ideology a couple of points?

> I repeat the word *minimal* for emphasis. If you are spending fifteen
> emails arguing a design, it isn't minimal.

Such as your design of defaulting to ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE ("") for SUB sockets?

-mato