[zeromq-dev] conventions in bindings

MinRK benjaminrk at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 19:52:46 CET 2012

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 09:09, Gary Wright <at2002+zmq at me.com> wrote:

Finally, I do want to emphasize that my comments have been in
> the spirit of better understanding ZMQ and its terminology. That doesn't
> *necessarily* translate to a desire to go on a renaming spree with
> the libzmq source code. Changing deployed APIs, even if it is just
> renaming, shouldn't be done casually.

I'm in the same camp.  I started this thread from the perspective that czmq
does some things that make using zeromq nicer/more intuitive from a higher
level binding, and I thought some formalization / documentation of this
sort of thing would be helpful for me and other bindings authors, so that I
might follow suit with PyZMQ as appropriate.  I did not mean to propose any
changes *at all* for libzmq itself.  I merely meant to have a conversation
that would flesh out the contents of the Guidelines for


> Gary Wright
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20120202/73d3332f/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list