[zeromq-dev] conventions in bindings

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Thu Feb 2 12:24:10 CET 2012

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Gary Wright <at2002+zmq at me.com> wrote:

> message:
> fragment:
> frame:

Makes sense. "fragment" is long, for an API word. But in fact the only
real issue to solve here is consistency: any semantics will work, if
repeated consistently. So there will be a lot of changes to make in
bindings, code, and docs. Anyone proposing changes has to be willing
to take this work on. There is no other way it will happen. ("I think
someone should do X" does not work and never has).


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list