[zeromq-dev] Question about Strange Socket Pairing

Matt Goodman meawoppl at gmail.com
Thu Dec 6 22:58:30 CET 2012

Ahhh.  Ok, so it it totally valid to have the subscriber "bind" the port
and the various publishers connect to it?

I am convinced now that ZMQ is really rad, but the internal mental hoop
jumping is still a bit hard for me.

--Matthew Goodman

Check Out My Website: http://craneium.net
Find me on LinkedIn: http://tinyurl.com/d6wlch

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Michel Pelletier <pelletier.michel at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Matt Goodman <meawoppl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mmkay.  That is what I was feeling.  So a followup question would then be
>> what it the correct way to go about this?  The push/pull socket thing works
>> well, I am just concerned about the HWM semantics of blocking.
>> I would much rather use a Pub/Sub connection model, but I would need
>> multiple publishers with a single subscriber?  This seems a bit backward.
> Not at all, a subscriber can subscribe to as many publishers as necessary.
>  Many to many, one to many, many to one, they're all valid.
> -Michel
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20121206/4624fab3/attachment.htm>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list