[zeromq-dev] dealer responsibility with the DEALER->REP pattern

Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com
Mon Apr 30 10:41:36 CEST 2012

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Mikhail Gorbunov <mikhail at sirena2000.ru> wrote:

> The credit-based flow control described above seems to be a bit overkill
> for me, though I am trying the LRU pattern right now and while it looks
> pretty simple and killing all my needs in maybe even less swings than the
> DEALER->REP did, it (silently) introduces persistent (durable) sockets.

It uses identities on ROUTER sockets but these are not durable.

IMO you need to read more the Guide and see some of the other
patterns. It'll help.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list